Mashable beats TechCrunch readership?
| by Derek Anderson |  Stumble this! |
December 11th 2006 |
|---|
Mashable completely blew TechCrunch out of the water. maybe
Mashable has 408k feedburner subscribers. Thats 408,000
TechCrunch has a measly 134k feedburner readers. Thats 134,000
…any comments on this?
It appears as though I may have jumped the gun. (sigh)
Stat Guru has left a comment with a link to the Alexaholic rankings for both sites in question.
Back to the mud.
| Get Widgets Lab by Email |
|---|
12 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post.
TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Search for related information
Custom Search
Well, Boing Boing has over 2156k feedburner subscribers: thats 2,156,000 !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lol
Comment by Eric — 12-11-06 @ 4:27 pm
Derek,
As an avid reader of your blog daily, I’m a bit disappointed by this post. I mean if you labeled it as a question then I’d understand but we all know mashable either has a glitch which they dont seem to care about or are fluffing the numbers.
Here’s the charts: http://www.alexaholic.com/mashable.com+techcrunch.com
Also, you can tell from replies on articles. Techcrunch is the industry leader. Numbers don’t lie.
Comment by Stat Guru — 12-11-06 @ 4:29 pm
Thank you Stat Guru! I should have known something was up when I managed to come upon something that wasn’t already news.
Comment by Derek Anderson — 12-11-06 @ 5:06 pm
I’m confused if that was a playful shot at me or what? I’m not here to start problems. Like I said I read your blog everyday. Just thought this post was first out of scope, where’s the mention of widgets? and very random, come on we all who’s bigger….
Comment by Stat Guru — 12-12-06 @ 9:23 am
Wow, I guess you should just stick with the widget thing. Thats really to bad that you can’t write about other things.
Comment by Your Wife — 12-12-06 @ 9:31 am
I stand corrected. Your right. It’s your blog. Your content. I’m just a reader. Carry-on, I’ll continue to read in lieu of it all.
Comment by Stat Guru — 12-12-06 @ 9:45 am
Stat Guru, There was no “shot” intended. I was trying to cope with my disappointment in not “getting the scoop”
“D”
Comment by Derek Anderson — 12-12-06 @ 9:46 am
You do have a point though. People come here for information on widgets. Not un-related rumor mongering.
In my minds eye I saw a traffic spike that rivaled anything I have experienced yet.
Readers like you are what keep me in line with the scope of the blog.
Thank You!
“D”
Comment by Derek Anderson — 12-12-06 @ 9:53 am
That number gets automatically generated through Feebburner API. So not much chance of gaming it. Also a quick look at the source of mashable tells nothing is wrong.
-V
Comment by Vivek Puri — 12-12-06 @ 11:44 am
Derrick,
Thanks for your reply. As you mentioned most readers are hear for the widget. Thats why I love your site. I’ve been a reader and will continue to be a reader. I’d like to speak to you VIA IM or something to discuss a widget platform and my personal widgets
Comment by Stat Guru — 12-12-06 @ 1:18 pm
Stat Guru
deralaand Google Talk
Comment by Derek Anderson — 12-12-06 @ 2:11 pm
Boingboing Mashable Feedburner Pageflakesè¿·å±€…
今天刚刚看到这æ¡æœ‰æ„æ€çš„消æ¯ï¼Œè²Œä¼¼åŽ»å¹´å‘生的。暂且说有人æ¶æ„通过Pageflakes注册了N多垃圾用户订阅Boingboingå’ŒMashable在FeedBurner上的Feed，Mashable更是达到惊人的四å万订阅ï¼ï¼Boingboing似乎…
Trackback by ä¸è¦å˜å¦ — 01-6-07 @ 2:10 pm