<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Cuil: Where are the Widgets?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.widgetslab.com/2008/07/28/cuil-where-are-the-widgets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.widgetslab.com/2008/07/28/cuil-where-are-the-widgets/</link> <description>All Widgets, All the Time, News, Reviews, Previews, Articles and Interviews</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Avatar</title><link>http://www.widgetslab.com/2008/07/28/cuil-where-are-the-widgets/#comment-521455</link> <dc:creator>Avatar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:45:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.widgetslab.com/2008/07/28/cuil-where-are-the-widgets/#comment-521455</guid> <description>@Siddharth: they got several factors in their favor:1.-incredible PR management (it is a very important factor) 2.-good design 3.-pedigree (they got key ex-googlers) 4.-Funding 5.-they are well connectedthat alone puts them over most of the rest for a fighting chance. even if the end product may not be as good. i think they want Microsoft or even AOL or ASK to acquire them but the thing is how much they want? they cannot be worth more than powerset ($100m) so unless they take that or below i don`t see them getting acquired fast. but hey who knows how fast their algorithm and search can evolve.. maybe it does well and in a year they can aim for well beyond $100m. one can never know. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Siddharth: they got several factors in their favor:</p><p>1.-incredible PR management (it is a very important factor)<br /> 2.-good design<br /> 3.-pedigree (they got key ex-googlers)<br /> 4.-Funding<br /> 5.-they are well connected</p><p>that alone puts them over most of the rest for a fighting chance. even if the end product may not be as good. i think they want Microsoft or even AOL or ASK to acquire them but the thing is how much they want? they cannot be worth more than powerset ($100m) so unless they take that or below i don`t see them getting acquired fast. but hey who knows how fast their algorithm and search can evolve.. maybe it does well and in a year they can aim for well beyond $100m. one can never know.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Siddharth</title><link>http://www.widgetslab.com/2008/07/28/cuil-where-are-the-widgets/#comment-521416</link> <dc:creator>Siddharth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:11:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.widgetslab.com/2008/07/28/cuil-where-are-the-widgets/#comment-521416</guid> <description>Cuil got much more popularity than it deserved it has nothing special in it than it claims just search for anything odd and u get No Result foundIT is nothing infront of google</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuil got much more popularity than it deserved<br /> it has nothing special in it than it claims<br /> just search for anything odd and u get No Result found</p><p>IT is nothing infront of google</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 346/350 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.widgetslab.com @ 2012-02-12 03:37:21 -->
