<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaFX Is Now Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.widgetslab.com/2009/08/10/javafx-is-now-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.widgetslab.com/2009/08/10/javafx-is-now-good/</link>
	<description>All Widgets, All the Time, News, Reviews, Previews, Articles and Interviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:30:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Avatar X</title>
		<link>http://www.widgetslab.com/2009/08/10/javafx-is-now-good/comment-page-1/#comment-1115978</link>
		<dc:creator>Avatar X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.widgetslab.com/2009/08/10/javafx-is-now-good/#comment-1115978</guid>
		<description>@vince

Yes, it is to be expected from what i talk about the whole authorization/certification thing with JavaFX

My guess is that they have not added a way for JavaFX to identify to the Mac or Linux yet. In the case of linux it is not so hard because the user can simply force it or someone else will have a way to simply run them. But in the Mac given how OS X work, i imagine that it is trickier and most 99% will prefer to just wait until it is added acordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@vince</p>
<p>Yes, it is to be expected from what i talk about the whole authorization/certification thing with JavaFX</p>
<p>My guess is that they have not added a way for JavaFX to identify to the Mac or Linux yet. In the case of linux it is not so hard because the user can simply force it or someone else will have a way to simply run them. But in the Mac given how OS X work, i imagine that it is trickier and most 99% will prefer to just wait until it is added acordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.widgetslab.com/2009/08/10/javafx-is-now-good/comment-page-1/#comment-1115146</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.widgetslab.com/2009/08/10/javafx-is-now-good/#comment-1115146</guid>
		<description>I wish I could try the examples on javafx.com on my Mac. Each time I load an example, it says something like &quot;cannot trust source, treating code as unsigned&quot;, and the it only shows the Java spinning wheel, not the actual app.
I guess the provisioning experience really has to be improved, so that it works on the 2nd major platform, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could try the examples on javafx.com on my Mac. Each time I load an example, it says something like &#8220;cannot trust source, treating code as unsigned&#8221;, and the it only shows the Java spinning wheel, not the actual app.<br />
I guess the provisioning experience really has to be improved, so that it works on the 2nd major platform, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JavaFX Tweeter Widget &#124; Widgets Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.widgetslab.com/2009/08/10/javafx-is-now-good/comment-page-1/#comment-1104836</link>
		<dc:creator>JavaFX Tweeter Widget &#124; Widgets Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.widgetslab.com/2009/08/10/javafx-is-now-good/#comment-1104836</guid>
		<description>[...] Having just posted about JavaFX in spite that i think not many are actually talking about it or giving it a chance (and also to prove wrong those naysayers that say i only post on Silverlight or Adobe when it comes RIAâ€™s). What better way to legitimize a new way to do widgets and apps than with a Twitter Widget?. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Having just posted about JavaFX in spite that i think not many are actually talking about it or giving it a chance (and also to prove wrong those naysayers that say i only post on Silverlight or Adobe when it comes RIAâ€™s). What better way to legitimize a new way to do widgets and apps than with a Twitter Widget?. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
