Posts Tagged ‘widgetlaboratory’

WidgetLaboratory Now In SocialGO

November 5th, 2008

        

No. Not us. they are another thing entirely. if you are confused. i exhort you to read on it in this post

I am glad to see WidgetLaboratory, the Social Network Widgetdeveloper previously based on Ning is back on its feet with SocialGo. SocialGo is one of Ning Competitors and some say it is the most promising one from the bunch. i guess that WidgetLaboratory new partnership or agreement gives them some extra points. after all. they know Ning very well. you could say they know it inside out. this of course a knowledge and tech deal. the kind of Knowledge they got on Ning will be extremely useful for SocialGO to build on. WidgetLaboratory on the other hand can simply apply what they already now in order to adapt quickly to SocialGO and model how Widgets or Widget-apps should work in SocialGO. so both of them win. Widgetlaboratory fight with Ning was quite of a deal to Ning. after all. They were their Prime Widget and Widget-app developer and as they got more leverage it was obvious that Ning got nervous and started to pick on them and put them into a entrapment. this caused Ning to say “the hell with it, this is not going to happen again”. so they went with a OpenSocial Approach. coincidence?. sure. sure. (not).

Many will wonder why i post on this. well. i enjoy entertaining feuds. this is certainly one.  a good example of bad blood is some poking from Widgetlaboratory CEO Spencer Forman towards Ning when the story was covered in Techcrunch:

Good Morning,

The LAB was created on Ning for the purpose of showing how to make money through social networking. We feel that our own “flavor” of unique products, service, and sometimes shocking honesty is what catapulted us into the position of having such wonderful success on their platform. We are unrepentant as to anything we’ve accomplished, said or done since we started this adventure in November of 2007. Obviously this comes at the price of being a polarizing force for those who know and love Ning.

At this time, we are thrilled to be in a new home that has actually allowed us to do what we do best, instead of fighting us step by step along the way. Although we stand by our legal and ethical position for the events that went down this summer with Ning, that’s old news. Ning has chosen to take an entirely new path for themselves that is unrelated to what they started in 2006, and it can be seen and judged by anyone who cares to inquire. There is nothing stopping anyone from using more than one platform for more than one goal.

And that is our point. WidgetLaboratory was always about showing people how to MONETIZE their social network. Our customers were able to make several hundred dollars or more per month in net profit from tools they purchased from us for as little as $19.00. SocialGO “gets” this, and WidgetLaboratory will prove it to anyone that is interested in moving out of the Social Networking version 1.0 mode and into the version 2.0 mode… where micro-economies can exist between people with similar interests through the use of scalable and modular products that enable commerce, barter, marketing, advertising, etc.

We think it’s wonderful that TechCrunch has chosen to feature us for another brief moment in time. We love even more the fact that the author has made it very clear in the first paragraph that we are liars and idiots. We’re pretty sure that this will generate a reasonable number of comments by the readers as to what Ning has done since WidgetLaboratory was kicked off the platform. As a former litigator myself, I was surprised that Mr. Arrington chose to give his legal opinions in his previous article back in August, as I didn’t think TC was about making legal conclusions as much as publishing facts. Nevertheless, I was glad that he did. The readers comments expressed a balanced opinion of why there might have been a reasonable legal and strategic reason for airing this inside communication, and they also pointed out certain potential conflicts of interest involving TC50 and Marc Andreessen.

Either way, time will demonstrate which company had the right business model, and which company respected the true demand in the marketplace for what people need to do in order to build a financially successful social network. The entire SocialGO platform will be underpinned with a rock-solid Bill of Rights for Network Creators that ensures them legally of complete and total control (in fact) over their members, network, and data. It is worth noting how Ning has subsequently changed all of their legal terms in a way that removes NC rights instead of creating or enforcing new ones.

There is plenty of room for fun Kung-Fu-Poke-Me Open Social Gadgets on Ning, while SocialGO and the LAB focus on building productivity and monetization products for entrepreneurs and small business.

We say… let the consumer try each and judge for themselves which one meets their needs.

Spencer Forman
CEO
WidgetLaboratory

It is not that delightful?. i will save my comments on all this beyond what i wrote above. but as i said i am glad they landed on their feed because the healthly the Widget Space is the better and that is a interest a blog like this is guilty of having.

Widgetlaboratory

SocialGO

via TC

Quick Recap of the whole Widgetlaboratory – Ning story

August 28th, 2008

WidgetLaboratory_white            

First things first. i am covering this story with a double interest. i am interested in the news but i am also interested in clearing up a very fun and even amusing confusion some of our readers had with this story. some thought that widgets lab had something to do with Widgetlaboratory because of the very similar name. so, without further delay i assure you that Widgets Lab DO NOT have anything to do with Widgetlaboratory beyond the name similarities. we also want to remind anyone that Widgets Lab was started before WidgetLaboratory if any also had a doubt about that.

The Players

As with any conflict worth covering, there is always two sides to the story. at one side we have Widgetlaboratory. they were a Widget and Widget-app developer for the Ning Platform. they provided all kinds of widgets and widget-apps to Ning users. at the other side we got NIng. They are a social network platform and social networks ecosystem where anyone can easily create its own Social Network .

The Story

ACT 1:“Everyone want to root for the underdog”

It started with a bang and lots of appeal. so much that Techcrunch decided to give it a premium coverage treatment. i cannot blame them. the basis of the story was that a poor widget developer, in this case Widgetlaboratory  was being abused by Ning, who decided in a envious burst of irrational ire to shutdown said widget developer out of the blue and with that also bring down lots of widgets that died and went to widgets heaven. sure hits and comments would surely ensue, they did.

Ning Shuts Down Premium Developer WidgetLaboratory

ACT 2:”the David versus Goliath skit”

Then, just when you thought things will pass Widgetlaboratory decided to do something in retaliation to go Open Source, so the code they used to serve for Ning users would be able to live again and previous widgets used and Ning could resurrect. and if Ning didn`t liked the code being served by Widgetlaboratory. now they would be surely mad to have to deal with it without being able to do much against widgetlaboratory anymore.

WidgetLaboratory Strikes Back At Ning Where It Hurts

ACT 3: “The Wolf in Sheep clothes”

Finally. things cleared out and it resulted that the victim was no victim,. that the killer was no killer, and that all we had believed in was just a mirage that faded and revealed some very simple truths that would not make anyone excited at all.

Don’t Post The Evidence Unless It Supports Your Case

The Story Revisited

Just like when you watch a movie. seeing it again makes you look at it differently. and in a lot of cases you end up realizing that it was not a good movie at all.

So what happened in resume is this:

  • 1.-Widgetlaboratory breaks the terms and rules of Ning house
  • 2.-Ning asks widgetlaboratory to please knock it off
  • 3.-Widgetlaboratory ignores Ning
  • 3.-Ning yells at widgetlaboratory to please knock it off
  • 4.-Widgetlaboratory ignores Ning
  • 5.-Ning is not pleased and kicks out Widgetlaboratory out to the street, throws its things out too
  • 6.-Widgetlaboratory swears revenge and incites others living in Ning house to revolt
  • 7.-Ning puts up a message in the fridge  that says that if others copy Widgetlaboratory behavior they will be thrown out too and maybe without warning.
  • 8.-Everyone at Ning house wonders about if this is fair but decide to do nothing for the moment
  • 9.-Widgetlaboratory admits defeat and finally stops wandering ning house trying to get in
  • 10.-Ning tries to pretend nothing happened but shows signs of stress and getting old

*the analogy should only be used as guide of what happened, not a absolute truth of what happened*

The even shorter version

It looks like if you are a successful Widget developer that depends on a sole platform you don`t control as your way of living don`t assures you will be able to continue if the owner of the platform gets mad with you because you may have been breaking the terms of service in that platform.

What is next?

Ning will continue in its quest to thrive and offer social networks for anyone that want them. Widgetlaboratory will have to adjust and try to rethink what they want to do. this does serve as a very fine example that you must have a failsafe if you are a developer that depends on one single platform. it also shows that it is a good idea to develop for more than one platform. i would recommend them to simply have a look at OpenSocial. their knowledge on Social Networks should allow them to do good enough in that. Widgets and widget-apps will continue to be interesting market to be in and from what i have learned in the time i have been covering widgets. there is lot of room to grow and evolve yet.